Objectives: To compare the ultrasound examination with pH-metry in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonography for diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) in preterm infants. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 31 premature infants <34 weeks with clinically diagnosed GOR. First, they underwent 24-hour pH-monitoring; successively, the sonographic assessment was performed within 12 h after pH-monitoring. The two operators who performed the pH-monitoring and sonography respectively, were unaware of each other's results. Results: Twenty-one patients (67.7%) had significant GOR with a reflux index >5 (GOR group). The median (range) reflux index in this group was 9.19% (6.04-20.1). Ten newborns (32.3%) did not have significant GOR with a reflux index <5. Sonography was positive for GOR in 8 patients (25.8%); all 8 infants with sonographic diagnosis of GOR had a reflux index >5. Therefore, sonographic diagnosis did not produce false positives. Sonography was negative in 23 newborns (74.2%); 13 of these were positive to pH-monitoring and may therefore be considered as false negatives. Respect to continuous 24-hour pH-monitoring, sonography showed a specificity of 100% but a very low sensitivity of 38% with a positive prediction value of 100% and a negative prediction value of 43%. Conclusions: Sonography should not replace 24-hour pH monitoring for detecting GOR in preterm infants. However, sonography has a very high specificity and a positive predictive value of 100%. When clinicians suspect GOR in preterm infants, it could be useful for selection of cases to refer for pH-metry. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG.

Diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants: Sonography vs. pH-monitoring

Filippi L.;
2007-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the ultrasound examination with pH-metry in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonography for diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) in preterm infants. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 31 premature infants <34 weeks with clinically diagnosed GOR. First, they underwent 24-hour pH-monitoring; successively, the sonographic assessment was performed within 12 h after pH-monitoring. The two operators who performed the pH-monitoring and sonography respectively, were unaware of each other's results. Results: Twenty-one patients (67.7%) had significant GOR with a reflux index >5 (GOR group). The median (range) reflux index in this group was 9.19% (6.04-20.1). Ten newborns (32.3%) did not have significant GOR with a reflux index <5. Sonography was positive for GOR in 8 patients (25.8%); all 8 infants with sonographic diagnosis of GOR had a reflux index >5. Therefore, sonographic diagnosis did not produce false positives. Sonography was negative in 23 newborns (74.2%); 13 of these were positive to pH-monitoring and may therefore be considered as false negatives. Respect to continuous 24-hour pH-monitoring, sonography showed a specificity of 100% but a very low sensitivity of 38% with a positive prediction value of 100% and a negative prediction value of 43%. Conclusions: Sonography should not replace 24-hour pH monitoring for detecting GOR in preterm infants. However, sonography has a very high specificity and a positive predictive value of 100%. When clinicians suspect GOR in preterm infants, it could be useful for selection of cases to refer for pH-metry. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG.
2007
Pezzati, M.; Filippi, L.; Psaraki, M.; Rossi, S.; Dani, C.; Tronchin, M.; Rubaltelli, F. F.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1072230
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact