Tillage plays a key role in cropping system sustainability due to its impact on soil properties, crop yields, economic returns, labor, and energy requirements. Th e objective of our research was to compare the eff ects of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) on durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity in a long-term, 2-yr rotation fi eld experiment initiated in 1986 under a Mediterranean climate. Th e 16-yr (1990–2005) average grain yield for NT wheat was 8.9% lower than that for CT wheat (3.97 vs. 4.36 Mg ha–1). Diff erences between tillage systems were signifi cant in 6 out of the 16 seasons and were small when planting was early, weed control was good, and rainfall defi cit occurred during the grain fi lling period. Th e 16-yr average grain yield for soybean was signifi cantly lower under NT than under CT (2.60 vs. 3.08 Mg ha–1) but diff erences between tillage systems were small and not signifi cant in 12 out of the 16 seasons. In comparison to wheat, NT soybean had higher weed pressure. Nitrogen concentrations in wheat and soybean were little aff ected by tillage. Phosphorus concentrations in wheat grain and straw were generally higher under NT, while diff erences in soybean tissue P due to tillage were negligible

Rainfed wheat and soybean productivity in a long-term tillage experiment in central Italy

ANTICHI D;
2008-01-01

Abstract

Tillage plays a key role in cropping system sustainability due to its impact on soil properties, crop yields, economic returns, labor, and energy requirements. Th e objective of our research was to compare the eff ects of no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) on durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity in a long-term, 2-yr rotation fi eld experiment initiated in 1986 under a Mediterranean climate. Th e 16-yr (1990–2005) average grain yield for NT wheat was 8.9% lower than that for CT wheat (3.97 vs. 4.36 Mg ha–1). Diff erences between tillage systems were signifi cant in 6 out of the 16 seasons and were small when planting was early, weed control was good, and rainfall defi cit occurred during the grain fi lling period. Th e 16-yr average grain yield for soybean was signifi cantly lower under NT than under CT (2.60 vs. 3.08 Mg ha–1) but diff erences between tillage systems were small and not signifi cant in 12 out of the 16 seasons. In comparison to wheat, NT soybean had higher weed pressure. Nitrogen concentrations in wheat and soybean were little aff ected by tillage. Phosphorus concentrations in wheat grain and straw were generally higher under NT, while diff erences in soybean tissue P due to tillage were negligible
2008
Mazzoncini, M; DI BENE, C; Coli, A; Antichi, D; Petri, M; Bonari, E
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2008 AJ.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 867.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
867.24 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Mazzoncini et al_2008.docx

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Post print senza veste editoriale nè figure
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 51.61 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
51.61 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/124891
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 47
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact