Through the analysis of the world-famous book by Rachel Carson, I set out to defend three theses concerning ecological science: 1)scientists should not be wary of crossing the line between facts and values, since dialectical rationality clearly shows that including moral values in scientific debates does not make science irrational or biased. On the contrary, if scientists are committed to a moral value, it is altogether rational for them to state it explicitly if this is required in a dialogue; 2) some scientific terms in ecology are “thick” in the sense that they have both a descriptive and a moral import. For positivists this implies that the language of ecology itself is biased, but I shall argue that this conclusion is not reasonable; 3)in order to be a good scientific advisor the ecologist must also have a good command of the moral discourse. None of my arguments infringe the so-called Hume’s law. Rather I shall show that facts and values are strongly intermingled in ecological science independently of the law.

Facts and Values in Ecology. Philosophical Insights from Rachel Carson's 'Silent Spring'"

BARROTTA, PIERLUIGI
2009-01-01

Abstract

Through the analysis of the world-famous book by Rachel Carson, I set out to defend three theses concerning ecological science: 1)scientists should not be wary of crossing the line between facts and values, since dialectical rationality clearly shows that including moral values in scientific debates does not make science irrational or biased. On the contrary, if scientists are committed to a moral value, it is altogether rational for them to state it explicitly if this is required in a dialogue; 2) some scientific terms in ecology are “thick” in the sense that they have both a descriptive and a moral import. For positivists this implies that the language of ecology itself is biased, but I shall argue that this conclusion is not reasonable; 3)in order to be a good scientific advisor the ecologist must also have a good command of the moral discourse. None of my arguments infringe the so-called Hume’s law. Rather I shall show that facts and values are strongly intermingled in ecological science independently of the law.
2009
Barrotta, Pierluigi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/129262
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact