The article focuses on the Vita of Ioann from Novgorod (Žitie Ioanna Novgorodskogo) and on the Vita of Antonij the Roman (Žitie Antonija Rimljanina). Both texts were composed in Novgorod, the former at the end of the 15th century, the latter at the end of 16th century. The author considers them within the historical context of their genesis and analyzes their literary form and function. The Vita of Ioann was collected just before the Muscovite State annexed Novgorod; the text became the symbol of the political independence of the town. The Vita of Antonij was written after the loss of independence, to defend Novgorodian cultural identity. These two vitae were thus created in different historical contexts but with similar ideological intentions. From the literary point of view, they resulted from the gathering and (re-)elaboration of pre-existing materials. Their inclusion in the biographies created apparently anomalous vitae. Textual analysis shows the repetition and the unifying role of some topics (i.e. miracles) and the lack of others. It also shows the presence in each text of three autonomous and well-defined narrative units. The hypothesis of a regional path in the development of Eastern Slavic hagiography seems thus possible. Before their inclusion in the Pan-Russian hagiographic tradition, the texts were partially rearranged to make their structures more regular.

Lo Zitie Ioanna Novgorodskogo e lo Zitie Antonija Rimljanina. Indizi di un percorso regionale nello sviluppo della letteratura agiografica slava orientale?

ROMOLI, FRANCESCA
2011-01-01

Abstract

The article focuses on the Vita of Ioann from Novgorod (Žitie Ioanna Novgorodskogo) and on the Vita of Antonij the Roman (Žitie Antonija Rimljanina). Both texts were composed in Novgorod, the former at the end of the 15th century, the latter at the end of 16th century. The author considers them within the historical context of their genesis and analyzes their literary form and function. The Vita of Ioann was collected just before the Muscovite State annexed Novgorod; the text became the symbol of the political independence of the town. The Vita of Antonij was written after the loss of independence, to defend Novgorodian cultural identity. These two vitae were thus created in different historical contexts but with similar ideological intentions. From the literary point of view, they resulted from the gathering and (re-)elaboration of pre-existing materials. Their inclusion in the biographies created apparently anomalous vitae. Textual analysis shows the repetition and the unifying role of some topics (i.e. miracles) and the lack of others. It also shows the presence in each text of three autonomous and well-defined narrative units. The hypothesis of a regional path in the development of Eastern Slavic hagiography seems thus possible. Before their inclusion in the Pan-Russian hagiographic tradition, the texts were partially rearranged to make their structures more regular.
2011
Romoli, Francesca
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/148405
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact