Two cases of histiocytosis X are reported. One affected a single bone, the other several bones. Both had the usual radiographic appearances, but a somewhat alarming cytological picture. The differential diagnosis between benign proliferative conditions and those possessing malignant or pseudo-malignant characteristics therefore demanded very careful consideration. After discussion of the radiological and histiocytological data, the diagnosis off histiocytosis X was arrived at, and in view of the favourable results, we are inclined to the view that these were atypical cases of eosinophilic granulom
Atypical eosinophil granuloma (Description of two cases)
CAPANNA, RODOLFO
1979-01-01
Abstract
Two cases of histiocytosis X are reported. One affected a single bone, the other several bones. Both had the usual radiographic appearances, but a somewhat alarming cytological picture. The differential diagnosis between benign proliferative conditions and those possessing malignant or pseudo-malignant characteristics therefore demanded very careful consideration. After discussion of the radiological and histiocytological data, the diagnosis off histiocytosis X was arrived at, and in view of the favourable results, we are inclined to the view that these were atypical cases of eosinophilic granulomFile in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
