This paper challenges the results of the “classical” managerial delegation literature, where it is assumed that the weight of the managerial bonus only depends on the owner’s will to maximise his own profits. By considering sales (S) (resp. relative profit (RP)) contracts, the received literature has found that (S,S) (resp. (RP,RP)) is the unique pure-strategy sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium in a game that contrasts S (resp. RP) with pure profit maximisation (PM). This paper shows that none of the previous results may not hold when the owner negotiates about managerial compensation with his manager.

Managerial Delegation Theory Revisited

FANTI, LUCIANO;GORI, LUCA
;
SODINI, MAURO
2017-01-01

Abstract

This paper challenges the results of the “classical” managerial delegation literature, where it is assumed that the weight of the managerial bonus only depends on the owner’s will to maximise his own profits. By considering sales (S) (resp. relative profit (RP)) contracts, the received literature has found that (S,S) (resp. (RP,RP)) is the unique pure-strategy sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium in a game that contrasts S (resp. RP) with pure profit maximisation (PM). This paper shows that none of the previous results may not hold when the owner negotiates about managerial compensation with his manager.
2017
Fanti, Luciano; Gori, Luca; Sodini, Mauro
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MDE_Post_Print.pdf

Open Access dal 01/07/2019

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 670.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
670.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Fanti, Gori and Sodini 2017 MDE.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 290.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
290.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/868170
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact