We propose an experimental comparison between Deep Echo State Networks (DeepESNs) and gated Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) on multivariate time-series prediction tasks. In particular, we compare reservoir and fully-trained RNNs able to represent signals featured by multiple time-scales dynamics. The analysis is performed in terms of efficiency and prediction accuracy on 4 polyphonic music tasks. Our results show that DeepESN is able to outperform ESN in terms of prediction accuracy and efficiency. Whereas, between fully-trained approaches, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) outperforms Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and simple RNN models in most cases. Overall, DeepESN turned out to be extremely more efficient than others RNN approaches and the best solution in terms of prediction accuracy on 3 out of 4 tasks.
Comparison between DeepESNs and gated RNNs on multivariate time-series prediction
Gallicchio C.;Micheli A.;Pedrelli L.
2019-01-01
Abstract
We propose an experimental comparison between Deep Echo State Networks (DeepESNs) and gated Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) on multivariate time-series prediction tasks. In particular, we compare reservoir and fully-trained RNNs able to represent signals featured by multiple time-scales dynamics. The analysis is performed in terms of efficiency and prediction accuracy on 4 polyphonic music tasks. Our results show that DeepESN is able to outperform ESN in terms of prediction accuracy and efficiency. Whereas, between fully-trained approaches, Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) outperforms Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and simple RNN models in most cases. Overall, DeepESN turned out to be extremely more efficient than others RNN approaches and the best solution in terms of prediction accuracy on 3 out of 4 tasks.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
