Prefix-free parsing (PFP) was introduced by Boucher et al. (2019) as a preprocessing step to ease the computation of Burrows-Wheeler Transforms (BWTs) of genomic databases. Given a string S, it produces a dictionary D and a parse P of overlapping phrases such that BWT(S) can be computed from D and P in time and workspace bounded in terms of their combined size |PFP(S)|. In practice D and P are significantly smaller than S and computing BWT(S) from them is more efficient than computing it from S directly, at least when S is the concatenation of many genomes. In this paper, we consider PFP(S) as a data structure and show how it can be augmented to support full suffix tree functionality, still built and fitting within O(|PFP(S)|) space. This entails the efficient computation of various primitives to simulate the suffix tree: computing a longest common extension (LCE) of two positions in S; reading any cell of its suffix array (SA), of its inverse (ISA), of its BWT, and of its longest common prefix array (LCP); and computing minima over ranges and next/previous smaller value queries over the LCP. Our experimental results show that the PFP suffix tree can be efficiently constructed for very large repetitive datasets and that its operations perform competitively with other compressed suffix trees that can only handle much smaller datasets.

PFP compressed suffix trees

Manzini G.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Prefix-free parsing (PFP) was introduced by Boucher et al. (2019) as a preprocessing step to ease the computation of Burrows-Wheeler Transforms (BWTs) of genomic databases. Given a string S, it produces a dictionary D and a parse P of overlapping phrases such that BWT(S) can be computed from D and P in time and workspace bounded in terms of their combined size |PFP(S)|. In practice D and P are significantly smaller than S and computing BWT(S) from them is more efficient than computing it from S directly, at least when S is the concatenation of many genomes. In this paper, we consider PFP(S) as a data structure and show how it can be augmented to support full suffix tree functionality, still built and fitting within O(|PFP(S)|) space. This entails the efficient computation of various primitives to simulate the suffix tree: computing a longest common extension (LCE) of two positions in S; reading any cell of its suffix array (SA), of its inverse (ISA), of its BWT, and of its longest common prefix array (LCP); and computing minima over ranges and next/previous smaller value queries over the LCP. Our experimental results show that the PFP suffix tree can be efficiently constructed for very large repetitive datasets and that its operations perform competitively with other compressed suffix trees that can only handle much smaller datasets.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1119168
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact