Impact coesite is generally considered a retrograde product formed during pressure release by the crystallization of an amorphous phase. Our recent TEM study, performed on impact ejecta from Kamil crater and the Australasian tektite strewn field, suggests a different coesite formation pathway through subsolidus quartz-to-coesite transformation (Campanale et al. 2021). In Kamil ejecta we found rounded single-crystal coesite domains of 200 nm or less. These domains are surrounded by shocked quartz, without any amorphous phase in-between. We also observed larger coesite domains. The larger the domains, the more they appear fragmented and progressively dispersed and resorbed in amorphous silica. Our observations suggest that coesite seeds nucleate and grow inside quartz during pressure uploading, probably favored by shock-wave reverberation. Later, when pressure is released and temperature is still high, coesite domains fragment and melt. In impact ejecta from the Australasian tektite strewn field, we again observe coesite crystals embedded in shocked quartz. Coesite crystals have well-developed euhedral habits, which grow at the expense of neighboring quartz, and appear to postdate PDFs and other planar microstructures. In both ejecta, 3D electron diffraction reveals coesite grains displaying a recurrent crystallographic relation with quartz, with (010) coesite plane parallel to {10-11} or {-1011} of quartz. Such evidence suggests a topotactic relation between shocked quartz and impact coesite. Remarkably, both samples experienced realtively fast coolin, which preserved a rock texture only sligthly altered by post-impact melting.

Subsolidus coesite formation in ejecta from Kamil crater and the Australasian strewn field

Mugnaioli E.
;
Campanale F.;Folco L.;Gemmi M.
2022-01-01

Abstract

Impact coesite is generally considered a retrograde product formed during pressure release by the crystallization of an amorphous phase. Our recent TEM study, performed on impact ejecta from Kamil crater and the Australasian tektite strewn field, suggests a different coesite formation pathway through subsolidus quartz-to-coesite transformation (Campanale et al. 2021). In Kamil ejecta we found rounded single-crystal coesite domains of 200 nm or less. These domains are surrounded by shocked quartz, without any amorphous phase in-between. We also observed larger coesite domains. The larger the domains, the more they appear fragmented and progressively dispersed and resorbed in amorphous silica. Our observations suggest that coesite seeds nucleate and grow inside quartz during pressure uploading, probably favored by shock-wave reverberation. Later, when pressure is released and temperature is still high, coesite domains fragment and melt. In impact ejecta from the Australasian tektite strewn field, we again observe coesite crystals embedded in shocked quartz. Coesite crystals have well-developed euhedral habits, which grow at the expense of neighboring quartz, and appear to postdate PDFs and other planar microstructures. In both ejecta, 3D electron diffraction reveals coesite grains displaying a recurrent crystallographic relation with quartz, with (010) coesite plane parallel to {10-11} or {-1011} of quartz. Such evidence suggests a topotactic relation between shocked quartz and impact coesite. Remarkably, both samples experienced realtively fast coolin, which preserved a rock texture only sligthly altered by post-impact melting.
2022
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
P2_08.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 633.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
633.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1153945
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact