In the last decade, the Italian bridge heritage, mostly made of ordinary or pre-stressed Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements, has increasingly shown signs of ageing, testified by the recent collapses as consequences of concurrent lack of maintenance, degradation of materials, increase in vehicular traffic and exceptional actions (e.g. due to landslides and floods). The recent Italian “Guidelines for classification and risk management of existing bridges” confirm the large interest at policy-making level for accurately assessing ordinary and ultimate performances of existing bridges, through a multi-level approach. As for the numerical simulations, to date Non-Linear Analysis (NLA) methods have been proposed in the literature only for designing new RC bridges. Among the others, EuroCode 2 (EC2) proposes a specific method for simulating the structural performance of new RC bridges, based on a specific safety-format (SF), where the mean values are the representative strengths for materials. In this paper, the application of the EC2 method, proposed for new RC bridges, is critically reviewed in order to examine its applicability to existing RC bridges. The use of the representative strengths is discussed, in relation to the current knowledge level achieved before the structural assessment. Estimation of modelling uncertainty is proposed to define some acceptance criteria for the specific numerical solution strategy to be used, following the most recent international research outputs. Finally, the relationship between the predictions provided by nonlinear analysis and those obtained by linear methodologies involving different levels of modelling detail is comparatively investigated with reference to a specific case study.

Critical issues in safety assessment of existing reinforced concrete bridges by means of nonlinear analysis

Caprili S.;Mattei F.;Dall'Asta A.;Salvatore W.
2022-01-01

Abstract

In the last decade, the Italian bridge heritage, mostly made of ordinary or pre-stressed Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements, has increasingly shown signs of ageing, testified by the recent collapses as consequences of concurrent lack of maintenance, degradation of materials, increase in vehicular traffic and exceptional actions (e.g. due to landslides and floods). The recent Italian “Guidelines for classification and risk management of existing bridges” confirm the large interest at policy-making level for accurately assessing ordinary and ultimate performances of existing bridges, through a multi-level approach. As for the numerical simulations, to date Non-Linear Analysis (NLA) methods have been proposed in the literature only for designing new RC bridges. Among the others, EuroCode 2 (EC2) proposes a specific method for simulating the structural performance of new RC bridges, based on a specific safety-format (SF), where the mean values are the representative strengths for materials. In this paper, the application of the EC2 method, proposed for new RC bridges, is critically reviewed in order to examine its applicability to existing RC bridges. The use of the representative strengths is discussed, in relation to the current knowledge level achieved before the structural assessment. Estimation of modelling uncertainty is proposed to define some acceptance criteria for the specific numerical solution strategy to be used, following the most recent international research outputs. Finally, the relationship between the predictions provided by nonlinear analysis and those obtained by linear methodologies involving different levels of modelling detail is comparatively investigated with reference to a specific case study.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1178529
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact