Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive glioma in adults supported by a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which constitute about one-third of the TME cells, could affect survival and therapeutic response. This study aims to deepen the TAMs prognostic role by analyzing macrophages’ polarization in a well-characterized series of GBM patients. Methods: Surgical specimens of 59 GBM adult patients were retrospectively selected, and where available relapsed tissue was also collected. Adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy, relapse, and cancer-related death times were annotated. Immunohistochemical expression of CD68, CD80, and CD163 was digitally assessed by HALO® v3.6 imaging analysis software. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 27.0 and GraphPad Prism v10.1. Results: A total of 23 (39%) patients relapsed and 54 (92%) died during the follow-up. Biomarker analysis showed higher levels of CD68 (p<0.00019), CD80 (p=0.0421) and CD163 (p<0.0001) in GMB tissues compared to peritumoral tissues, with significant CD163 upregulation (p<0.0024) in recurrent tumors tissue. CD163 were significantly higher in peritumoral (p=0.0078) and GMB tissue (p<0.0001) in relapses vs primary GBM. Spearman analysis supported positive correlation among these markers in primary and recurrent tissues. Prognostically, CD163High/CD80High subgroup showed a lower overall survival (OS), (HR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.2-4.4; p=0.027) and progression-free survival (PFS), (HR=1.41; 95%CI: 0.8-2.5; p=0.213) compared to other subgroups. Conclusion: This study confirms the intricacy and multifaceted GBM’s microenvironment. It challenges the notion of macrophage polarization as a simple M1 or M2 dichotomy, despite the notable CD163 expression in GBM TME. Instead, it suggests a synergy between macrophage populations, by identifying a subgroup with high concurrent CD80 and CD163 expression as a negative prognostic factor for OS and PFS. These findings highlight TAMs as potential therapeutic targets and may lead to personalized oncology therapies.

Macrophage Polarization and Prognostic Implications in Glioblastoma

Eugenia Belcastro
Primo
;
cristian scatena;lorenzo beldramme;Francesco Pasqualetti;Nicola Montemurro;Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato;nicolo Fanelli
2024-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive glioma in adults supported by a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which constitute about one-third of the TME cells, could affect survival and therapeutic response. This study aims to deepen the TAMs prognostic role by analyzing macrophages’ polarization in a well-characterized series of GBM patients. Methods: Surgical specimens of 59 GBM adult patients were retrospectively selected, and where available relapsed tissue was also collected. Adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy, relapse, and cancer-related death times were annotated. Immunohistochemical expression of CD68, CD80, and CD163 was digitally assessed by HALO® v3.6 imaging analysis software. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 27.0 and GraphPad Prism v10.1. Results: A total of 23 (39%) patients relapsed and 54 (92%) died during the follow-up. Biomarker analysis showed higher levels of CD68 (p<0.00019), CD80 (p=0.0421) and CD163 (p<0.0001) in GMB tissues compared to peritumoral tissues, with significant CD163 upregulation (p<0.0024) in recurrent tumors tissue. CD163 were significantly higher in peritumoral (p=0.0078) and GMB tissue (p<0.0001) in relapses vs primary GBM. Spearman analysis supported positive correlation among these markers in primary and recurrent tissues. Prognostically, CD163High/CD80High subgroup showed a lower overall survival (OS), (HR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.2-4.4; p=0.027) and progression-free survival (PFS), (HR=1.41; 95%CI: 0.8-2.5; p=0.213) compared to other subgroups. Conclusion: This study confirms the intricacy and multifaceted GBM’s microenvironment. It challenges the notion of macrophage polarization as a simple M1 or M2 dichotomy, despite the notable CD163 expression in GBM TME. Instead, it suggests a synergy between macrophage populations, by identifying a subgroup with high concurrent CD80 and CD163 expression as a negative prognostic factor for OS and PFS. These findings highlight TAMs as potential therapeutic targets and may lead to personalized oncology therapies.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1267647
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact