To help architects in real life work it is needed to clarify what a building is from their point of view. Till now we have seen that building design aid programs are mainly conceived from an “external” perspective, that of computer scientists. Difficulties related to architectural design support programs result from: an insufficient overall model of the building; an inadequate formalization of information; an underestimated complexity inherent in the design process. To overcome these difficulties we introduce a 'systemic' building model that takes into account discipline-specific goals by means of relation structures to relate entities of domains and ontologies to formalize knowledge.

Computing Ontologies to Support AEC Collaborative Design: Towards a Building Organism delicate concept

Trento, Armando
2011-01-01

Abstract

To help architects in real life work it is needed to clarify what a building is from their point of view. Till now we have seen that building design aid programs are mainly conceived from an “external” perspective, that of computer scientists. Difficulties related to architectural design support programs result from: an insufficient overall model of the building; an inadequate formalization of information; an underestimated complexity inherent in the design process. To overcome these difficulties we introduce a 'systemic' building model that takes into account discipline-specific goals by means of relation structures to relate entities of domains and ontologies to formalize knowledge.
2011
9789491207013
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fioravanti_Computing_2011.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.99 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.99 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1267933
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact