The paper offers a critical reflection on the crisis of memory in the digital age, characterized by the paradox between unprecedented information production and the growing fragility of preservation and transmission processes. The authors question the idea of digitization as an automatic solution to the challenges of safeguarding and accessing memory, emphasizing instead its selective, interpretative, and inherently political nature. Through three key questions—why we digitize, who decides what should be digitized and preserved, and how digitized and born-digital sources are used—the paper examines ongoing transformations in archival practices, historical research, and public history. Particular attention is given to the tension between institutional archives and distributed, participatory archives, as well as to the impact of artificial intelligence on the use, mediation, and interpretation of historical sources. The contribution calls for a shared and interdisciplinary “pause for reflection,” involving historians, archivists, computer scientists, and communities, in order to foster more conscious, sustainable, and responsible approaches to the construction of contemporary digital memory.
Il contributo propone una riflessione critica sulla crisi della memoria nell’era digitale, caratterizzata dal paradosso tra una produzione informativa senza precedenti e la crescente fragilità dei processi di conservazione e trasmissione. Gli autori mettono in discussione l’idea della digitalizzazione come risposta automatica ai problemi della tutela e dell’accesso alla memoria, evidenziandone invece la natura selettiva, interpretativa e profondamente politica. Attraverso tre domande chiave – perché digitalizziamo, chi decide cosa digitalizzare e conservare, come utilizziamo le fonti digitalizzate e digitali – il saggio analizza le trasformazioni in atto nelle pratiche archivistiche, storiche e di Public History. Particolare attenzione è dedicata alla tensione tra archivi istituzionali e archivi distribuiti e partecipativi, nonché agli effetti dell’intelligenza artificiale sull’uso, sulla mediazione e sull’interpretazione delle fonti storiche. Il contributo auspica una “pausa” di riflessione condivisa e interdisciplinare, capace di coinvolgere storici, archivisti, informatici e comunità, per orientare scelte più consapevoli, sostenibili e responsabili nella costruzione della memoria digitale contemporanea.
Una pausa e tre domande. La crisi della memoria nell’era dell’accesso
Enrica Salvatori;Federico Valacchi
2026-01-01
Abstract
The paper offers a critical reflection on the crisis of memory in the digital age, characterized by the paradox between unprecedented information production and the growing fragility of preservation and transmission processes. The authors question the idea of digitization as an automatic solution to the challenges of safeguarding and accessing memory, emphasizing instead its selective, interpretative, and inherently political nature. Through three key questions—why we digitize, who decides what should be digitized and preserved, and how digitized and born-digital sources are used—the paper examines ongoing transformations in archival practices, historical research, and public history. Particular attention is given to the tension between institutional archives and distributed, participatory archives, as well as to the impact of artificial intelligence on the use, mediation, and interpretation of historical sources. The contribution calls for a shared and interdisciplinary “pause for reflection,” involving historians, archivists, computer scientists, and communities, in order to foster more conscious, sustainable, and responsible approaches to the construction of contemporary digital memory.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


