This taxonomy emerges from the need to systematically map and analyze AI-based Research Support Systems, with a specific focus on tools designed to assist key phases of the research lifecycle. In particular, it targets systems that support literature discovery, concept mapping, gap detection, and automatic citation generation, which are increasingly being enhanced through the integration of LLMs. The rapid proliferation of such tools calls for a structured framework to better understand their functional capabilities, architectural choices, and underlying data strategies. Beyond functionality, this taxonomy also investigates the context of development, distinguishing between academic, industrial, and hybrid initiatives, in order to highlight differences in design goals, openness, and reproducibility. A central aspect of this analysis concerns the adoption of Knowledge Graphs (KGs). These structured data representations play a crucial role in enabling improved transparency, verifiable reasoning mechanisms, and mitigation of LLM hallucinations through grounded information. The taxonomy explicitly captures whether and how systems leverage KGs, distinguishing between open graph, proprietary, and dynamically generated approaches and if they are domain-specific or general-purpose.

AI Research Support Systems - Taxonomy

Rubin Giorgia
;
Bardi Alessia
2026-01-01

Abstract

This taxonomy emerges from the need to systematically map and analyze AI-based Research Support Systems, with a specific focus on tools designed to assist key phases of the research lifecycle. In particular, it targets systems that support literature discovery, concept mapping, gap detection, and automatic citation generation, which are increasingly being enhanced through the integration of LLMs. The rapid proliferation of such tools calls for a structured framework to better understand their functional capabilities, architectural choices, and underlying data strategies. Beyond functionality, this taxonomy also investigates the context of development, distinguishing between academic, industrial, and hybrid initiatives, in order to highlight differences in design goals, openness, and reproducibility. A central aspect of this analysis concerns the adoption of Knowledge Graphs (KGs). These structured data representations play a crucial role in enabling improved transparency, verifiable reasoning mechanisms, and mitigation of LLM hallucinations through grounded information. The taxonomy explicitly captures whether and how systems leverage KGs, distinguishing between open graph, proprietary, and dynamically generated approaches and if they are domain-specific or general-purpose.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1370397
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact