Within the PROINDUSTRY project a Performance-based analysis framework is defined for seismic assessment of industrial structures, based on Nonlinear Response History Analysis (NL RHA) using in particular the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) method. This paper describes the choice of the PBEE and IDA analysis methods starting from an overview of state-of-the-art methods. The choice is analyzed in relation to: analysis goals for the selected case studies (design-based vs. risk-based), availability of databases/tools for hazard analysis and GMs selection, accuracy of criteria to scale and match GMs to a target spectrum (UHS, CMS, etc.) and treatment of record components. Three possible approaches of GMs selection are described and analyzed: (1) UHS-coherent Unscaled (Design), (2) UHScoherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1) (Risk/Loss), (3) CMS-coherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1), (Risk/Loss). Within the scopes of PROINDUSTRY, the approach (1) is proposed, as a tradeoff between simplicity of conventional PBEE design methods and probabilistic robustness for a heterogeneous portfolio of structures/facilities.
PERFORMANCE-BASED NONLINEAR RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR THE “PROINDUSTRY” PROJECT CASE STUDIES
MORELLI, FRANCESCO;SALVATORE, WALTER
2016-01-01
Abstract
Within the PROINDUSTRY project a Performance-based analysis framework is defined for seismic assessment of industrial structures, based on Nonlinear Response History Analysis (NL RHA) using in particular the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) method. This paper describes the choice of the PBEE and IDA analysis methods starting from an overview of state-of-the-art methods. The choice is analyzed in relation to: analysis goals for the selected case studies (design-based vs. risk-based), availability of databases/tools for hazard analysis and GMs selection, accuracy of criteria to scale and match GMs to a target spectrum (UHS, CMS, etc.) and treatment of record components. Three possible approaches of GMs selection are described and analyzed: (1) UHS-coherent Unscaled (Design), (2) UHScoherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1) (Risk/Loss), (3) CMS-coherent GMs scaled to Sa(T1), (Risk/Loss). Within the scopes of PROINDUSTRY, the approach (1) is proposed, as a tradeoff between simplicity of conventional PBEE design methods and probabilistic robustness for a heterogeneous portfolio of structures/facilities.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
