We are developing a PEM detector head based on two planar detector heads each measuring 6×6cm2. Each head is composed of a 3×3 matrix of R8520-C12 phototubes from Hamamatsu and a YAP: Ce array of 2×2×30mm3 pixels manufactured by Crytur. The R8520 is a compact 25.7×25.7mm2 square detector that has an active area of 22×22mm2. It has an excellent imaging performance and its square shape lends it well to PEM applications where a large active area is important to maximise sensitivity. However, even when tiled, the R8520-C12 only has an active area of 73% Therefore, in an effort to recover the pixels lying on the detector boundaries that are not directly viewed by the active area, we have used a technique involving a quartz light diffuser between the crystal matrix and the PSPMT detectors. It is possible to recover virtually 100% of the area, but at the expense of a reduction in the system spatial resolution. Therefore, we have tested two versions of the detector head; one with the quartz diffuser which should provide a better sensitivity through maximised active area, and a second with no quartz that should have a superior imaging performance. Flood images are used to compare these two systems in terms of pixel identification and geometrical efficiency.
Development of a planar head PEM system based on an array of PSPMT and YAP crystals
BELCARI, NICOLA;
2003-01-01
Abstract
We are developing a PEM detector head based on two planar detector heads each measuring 6×6cm2. Each head is composed of a 3×3 matrix of R8520-C12 phototubes from Hamamatsu and a YAP: Ce array of 2×2×30mm3 pixels manufactured by Crytur. The R8520 is a compact 25.7×25.7mm2 square detector that has an active area of 22×22mm2. It has an excellent imaging performance and its square shape lends it well to PEM applications where a large active area is important to maximise sensitivity. However, even when tiled, the R8520-C12 only has an active area of 73% Therefore, in an effort to recover the pixels lying on the detector boundaries that are not directly viewed by the active area, we have used a technique involving a quartz light diffuser between the crystal matrix and the PSPMT detectors. It is possible to recover virtually 100% of the area, but at the expense of a reduction in the system spatial resolution. Therefore, we have tested two versions of the detector head; one with the quartz diffuser which should provide a better sensitivity through maximised active area, and a second with no quartz that should have a superior imaging performance. Flood images are used to compare these two systems in terms of pixel identification and geometrical efficiency.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
