In this paper, we present and compare the design and the performances of ten different implementations for a 16-bit adder in a 180nm CMOS standard-cell technology. Ripple carry adder, increment adder, triangle adder, uniform and progressive carry select adder, uniform and progressive carry bypass adder, conditional adder, ripple carry look ahead adder and hierarchical carry look ahead adder are taken into account. Every architecture is explained, highlighting the pros and cons. Finally, the results of area complexity, worst path timing and average power consumption for each implementation are shown.

Performance of digital adder architectures in 180nm CMOS standard-cell technology

PILATO, LUCA;SAPONARA, SERGIO
Co-primo
;
FANUCCI, LUCA
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, we present and compare the design and the performances of ten different implementations for a 16-bit adder in a 180nm CMOS standard-cell technology. Ripple carry adder, increment adder, triangle adder, uniform and progressive carry select adder, uniform and progressive carry bypass adder, conditional adder, ripple carry look ahead adder and hierarchical carry look ahead adder are taken into account. Every architecture is explained, highlighting the pros and cons. Finally, the results of area complexity, worst path timing and average power consumption for each implementation are shown.
2016
9788026106012
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/811417
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact