This paper deals with the validation of the multifield computational fluid dynamics code NEPTUNE_CFD v2.0.1 against experimental data available from the OECD/NRC NUPEC PWR subchannel and bundle tests (PSBT) international benchmark. The present work is performed in the framework of the NURESAFE European collaborative project and focuses on the steady-state single subchannel void fraction tests. From overall 126 PSBT experiments covering wide range of test conditions and 4 different geometrical configurations of PWR subchannel, 42 tests have been selected and simulated using NEPTUNE_CFD. Following the NEA/CSNI (Nuclear Energy Agency / Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations) best practice guidelines about computational grid design and grid quality, mesh sensitivity analysis has been performed using axial and radial grid refinement. Both axial and radial mesh sensitivity studies do not exhibit any significant change in the predicted results, which thus result to be grid-converged. Besides, a series of sensitivity calculations have been performed in order to investigate the influence of uncertainties of the experimental boundary conditions on the code predictions. The influence of code physical and closure models on the void fraction prediction has been studied and discussed in detail. Generally, the calculated cross-sectional averaged void fraction at the measurement plane differs from the measured one by maximum of +/- 8%. This discrepancy is comparable to the 2σ experimental uncertainty range on void fraction measurement. The performed investigations have shown the ability of NEPTUNE_CFD to predict reasonably the void fraction in PSBT subchannel using appropriate modelling.

Assessment of NEPTUNE_CFD Code Capabilities to Simulate Two-Phase Flow in the OECD/NRC PSBT Subchannel Experiments

D'AURIA, FRANCESCO SAVERIO
2015-01-01

Abstract

This paper deals with the validation of the multifield computational fluid dynamics code NEPTUNE_CFD v2.0.1 against experimental data available from the OECD/NRC NUPEC PWR subchannel and bundle tests (PSBT) international benchmark. The present work is performed in the framework of the NURESAFE European collaborative project and focuses on the steady-state single subchannel void fraction tests. From overall 126 PSBT experiments covering wide range of test conditions and 4 different geometrical configurations of PWR subchannel, 42 tests have been selected and simulated using NEPTUNE_CFD. Following the NEA/CSNI (Nuclear Energy Agency / Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations) best practice guidelines about computational grid design and grid quality, mesh sensitivity analysis has been performed using axial and radial grid refinement. Both axial and radial mesh sensitivity studies do not exhibit any significant change in the predicted results, which thus result to be grid-converged. Besides, a series of sensitivity calculations have been performed in order to investigate the influence of uncertainties of the experimental boundary conditions on the code predictions. The influence of code physical and closure models on the void fraction prediction has been studied and discussed in detail. Generally, the calculated cross-sectional averaged void fraction at the measurement plane differs from the measured one by maximum of +/- 8%. This discrepancy is comparable to the 2σ experimental uncertainty range on void fraction measurement. The performed investigations have shown the ability of NEPTUNE_CFD to predict reasonably the void fraction in PSBT subchannel using appropriate modelling.
2015
978-9-61-620738-6
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1004-NENE2015_205.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 865.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
865.33 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/835844
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact