This paper presents results of a code validation activity that has been carried out at the University of Pisa within the EC-funded NURESAFE project, aimed to assess CATHARE2 v2.5_3 Mod3.1 code capabilities to simulate scenarios featuring reflood conditions. For such purpose, experimental data available from FEBA and ACHILLES separate-effect test facilities was used. In order to set-up a reference calculation model, rigorous sensitivity studies have been performed for every of the selected experimental test facilities. Quantitative analysis of the results has been carried out for all of the considered tests, using the Fast Fourier Transform Based Method (FFTBM) for accuracy quantification of code predictions. The calculations of experimental tests of ACHILLES facility have been performed with CATHARE2 v2.5_3 mod 3.1 using both 1-D and 3-D models. The no-regression of the results predicted by such code was successfully checked through qualitative and quantitative comparison with results obtained by the one of previous code versions: CATHARE2 v2.5_2 mod 7.1. An assessment of the capabilities of the new CATHARE3 v1.3.13 code to simulate reflood phenomena using both two- and three-field 1-D models has then been carried out, based on the same ACHILLES tests. Simulations by CATHARE3 (three-field) exhibit faster quenching than CATHARE2, mainly due to the presence of the droplet field enhancing the heat exchange from the fuel rod simulators. The performed qualitative analysis has shown the ability of CATHARE2 code to capture the main features of the reflood phenomena using appropriate modeling. Nonetheless, the quantitative analysis shows a systematic underprediction of the PCT and faster quenching in the majority of tests.

Validation of CATHARE TH-SYS Code Against Experimental Reflood Tests

D'AURIA, FRANCESCO SAVERIO
2015-01-01

Abstract

This paper presents results of a code validation activity that has been carried out at the University of Pisa within the EC-funded NURESAFE project, aimed to assess CATHARE2 v2.5_3 Mod3.1 code capabilities to simulate scenarios featuring reflood conditions. For such purpose, experimental data available from FEBA and ACHILLES separate-effect test facilities was used. In order to set-up a reference calculation model, rigorous sensitivity studies have been performed for every of the selected experimental test facilities. Quantitative analysis of the results has been carried out for all of the considered tests, using the Fast Fourier Transform Based Method (FFTBM) for accuracy quantification of code predictions. The calculations of experimental tests of ACHILLES facility have been performed with CATHARE2 v2.5_3 mod 3.1 using both 1-D and 3-D models. The no-regression of the results predicted by such code was successfully checked through qualitative and quantitative comparison with results obtained by the one of previous code versions: CATHARE2 v2.5_2 mod 7.1. An assessment of the capabilities of the new CATHARE3 v1.3.13 code to simulate reflood phenomena using both two- and three-field 1-D models has then been carried out, based on the same ACHILLES tests. Simulations by CATHARE3 (three-field) exhibit faster quenching than CATHARE2, mainly due to the presence of the droplet field enhancing the heat exchange from the fuel rod simulators. The performed qualitative analysis has shown the ability of CATHARE2 code to capture the main features of the reflood phenomena using appropriate modeling. Nonetheless, the quantitative analysis shows a systematic underprediction of the PCT and faster quenching in the majority of tests.
2015
9781510811843
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1007-13387nostri.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 972.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
972.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/835852
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact