The shared task of the 5th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon (CogALex-V) aims at providing a common benchmark for testing current corpus-based methods for the identifica- tion of lexical semantic relations ( synonymy , antonymy , hypernymy , part-whole meronymy ) and at gaining a better understanding of their respective strengths and weaknesses. The shared task uses a challenging dataset extracted from EVALution 1.0 (Santus et al., 2015b), which contains word pairs holding the above-mentioned relations as well as semantically unrelated control items ( random ). The task is split into two subtasks: (i) identification of related word pairs vs. unre- lated ones; (ii) classification of the word pairs according to their semantic relation. This paper describes the subtasks, the dataset, the evaluation metrics, the seven participating systems and their results. The best performing system in subtask 1 is GHHH ( F 1 = 0 . 790 ), while the best system in subtask 2 is LexNet ( F 1 = 0 . 445 ). The dataset and the task description are available at https://sites.google.com/site/cogalex2016/home/shared-task .

The CogALex-V Shared Task on the Corpus-Based Identification of Semantic Relations

LENCI, ALESSANDRO
Co-primo
2016-01-01

Abstract

The shared task of the 5th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon (CogALex-V) aims at providing a common benchmark for testing current corpus-based methods for the identifica- tion of lexical semantic relations ( synonymy , antonymy , hypernymy , part-whole meronymy ) and at gaining a better understanding of their respective strengths and weaknesses. The shared task uses a challenging dataset extracted from EVALution 1.0 (Santus et al., 2015b), which contains word pairs holding the above-mentioned relations as well as semantically unrelated control items ( random ). The task is split into two subtasks: (i) identification of related word pairs vs. unre- lated ones; (ii) classification of the word pairs according to their semantic relation. This paper describes the subtasks, the dataset, the evaluation metrics, the seven participating systems and their results. The best performing system in subtask 1 is GHHH ( F 1 = 0 . 790 ), while the best system in subtask 2 is LexNet ( F 1 = 0 . 445 ). The dataset and the task description are available at https://sites.google.com/site/cogalex2016/home/shared-task .
2016
978-4-87974-721-1
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/841909
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact