In this paper, we analyze and compare four multi-objective evolutionary granular rule-based classifiers. We learn concurrently the rule base, the most suitable number of granules and their parameters during the evolutionary process. Rule learning is performed by a method, which selects rules and conditions from an initial heuristically-generated rule base. The four classifiers differ for the type of granule, namely Type-1 and Type-2 fuzzy sets, and for the method used for generating the initial rule base, namely crisp and fuzzy decision tree learning algorithms. Results show that generating the initial rule base by using a fuzzy decision tree outperforms the use of the crisp decision tree. On the other hand, no statistical difference exists between the use of Type-1 and Type-2 fuzzy sets as granules.
Multi-objective evolutionary granular rule-based classifiers: An experimental comparison
Ducange, Pietro;Marcelloni, Francesco
2017-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze and compare four multi-objective evolutionary granular rule-based classifiers. We learn concurrently the rule base, the most suitable number of granules and their parameters during the evolutionary process. Rule learning is performed by a method, which selects rules and conditions from an initial heuristically-generated rule base. The four classifiers differ for the type of granule, namely Type-1 and Type-2 fuzzy sets, and for the method used for generating the initial rule base, namely crisp and fuzzy decision tree learning algorithms. Results show that generating the initial rule base by using a fuzzy decision tree outperforms the use of the crisp decision tree. On the other hand, no statistical difference exists between the use of Type-1 and Type-2 fuzzy sets as granules.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.