Dealing with dissent, the paper focuses on the Italian experience and a very recent practice — the replacement of the rapporteur judge to draft the judgment — which represents, or may represent, a signal of dissent within a context where the possible existence of dissent is usually unknown.
COULD THERE BE AN ITALIAN WAY FOR INTRODUCING DISSENTING OPINIONS? THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN THE ITALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT THROUGH DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE RAPPORTEUR JUDGE AND THE OPINION-WRITER JUDGE
saulle panizza
2019-01-01
Abstract
Dealing with dissent, the paper focuses on the Italian experience and a very recent practice — the replacement of the rapporteur judge to draft the judgment — which represents, or may represent, a signal of dissent within a context where the possible existence of dissent is usually unknown.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
