Objectives:The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets.Materials and Methods:An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: Mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment.Results:Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group.Conclusion:Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.

Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Without Eliminating Granulation Tissue: A 3-Year Study

Barone A.;Covani U.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets.Materials and Methods:An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: Mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment.Results:Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group.Conclusion:Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.
2019
Crespi, R.; Marconcini, S.; Crespi, G.; Giammarinaro, E.; Menchini Fabris, G. B.; Barone, A.; Covani, U.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
crespi2018.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 284.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
284.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1003838
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact