Background: The outcome of adrenalectomy carried out by laparoscopy or open surgery for solid tumor metastases was assessed. Methods: A total of 317 patients with histologically confirmed adrenal metastatic disease collected from 30 centres in Europe underwent adrenalectomy by laparoscopy (n=146) or open laparotomy (n=171). Differences between laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy were assessed by a single Cox analysis for both procedures. Results: The median overall survival was 24.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.4–26.6] months for open adrenalectomy and 45.0 (95% CI: 22.6–67.4) for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P=0.008). Survival rates were 68%, 49%, 35% and 29% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years for open surgery vs. 88%, 62%, 52% and 46% for laparoscopy, respectively. In the subgroup of R0 resections, the difference in survival in favor of laparoscopy (median 46 vs. 27 months) was marginally significant (P=0.073). Renal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23–0.76, P=0.005], surgery of the primary tumor (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19–0.54), and use of chemotherapy (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.88) were associated with a better survival, whereas type of resection (R1/R2 vs. R0) was associated with a worse prognosis (HR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.52–3.44, P<0.001). Conclusions: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy patients showed a longer survival than open adrenalectomy individuals, as minimally invasive approach was attempted more common in less advanced disease which led to higher number of R0 resections.

Laparoscopy versus open adrenalectomy in patients with solid tumor metastases: results of a multicenter European study

Marco Puccini
Investigation
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background: The outcome of adrenalectomy carried out by laparoscopy or open surgery for solid tumor metastases was assessed. Methods: A total of 317 patients with histologically confirmed adrenal metastatic disease collected from 30 centres in Europe underwent adrenalectomy by laparoscopy (n=146) or open laparotomy (n=171). Differences between laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy were assessed by a single Cox analysis for both procedures. Results: The median overall survival was 24.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.4–26.6] months for open adrenalectomy and 45.0 (95% CI: 22.6–67.4) for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P=0.008). Survival rates were 68%, 49%, 35% and 29% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years for open surgery vs. 88%, 62%, 52% and 46% for laparoscopy, respectively. In the subgroup of R0 resections, the difference in survival in favor of laparoscopy (median 46 vs. 27 months) was marginally significant (P=0.073). Renal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23–0.76, P=0.005], surgery of the primary tumor (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19–0.54), and use of chemotherapy (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.88) were associated with a better survival, whereas type of resection (R1/R2 vs. R0) was associated with a worse prognosis (HR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.52–3.44, P<0.001). Conclusions: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy patients showed a longer survival than open adrenalectomy individuals, as minimally invasive approach was attempted more common in less advanced disease which led to higher number of R0 resections.
2020
Moreno, Pablo; de la Quintana Basarrate, Aitor; Musholt, Thomas J.; Paunovic, Ivan; Puccini, Marco; Vidal, Óscar; Ortega, Joaquín; Kraimps, Jean-Louis...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020 Moreno_Lap vs Open Adrenalectomy in Mets.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 254.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
254.57 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1041480
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact