Background: Cosmetic satisfaction is not only based on the patient’s perception of the scar itself but is also related to body image self-evaluation. Cosmetic superiority of Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) over conventional thyroidectomy (CT) has not yet been clearly demonstrated. Aim of our study was to compare body image in patients undergoing CT versus RATT. Methods: The study included 160 (80 CT and 80 RATT) patients undergoing thyroidectomy between August 2014 and March 2018 at the Endocrine Surgery Department. The inclusion criteria were age 18 to < 60 years, female sex, thyroid volume < 30 mL, and nodule diameter < 5 cm. Scar length, operative time, and complications were analyzed. The body image questionnaire (BIQ) was used 3 months postoperatively. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Age was lower in RATT group (38.2 vs 41.4 years) (P < 0.0001). The nodule diameter was larger in RATT group (27.1 vs 23.1 mm) (P = 0.028). Operative time was longer in RATT group (93.7 vs 47.6 min) (P < 0.0001). The scar was longer in RATT group (59.9 vs 37.7 mm) (P < 0.0001). The groups had similar complication rates. BIQ showed that RATT patients answered more favorably to question 2, “Do you feel the operation has damaged your body?” (P = 0.042) and to question 3, “Do you feel less attractive as a result of your treatment?” (P = 0.024). Also self-global satisfaction was better in RATT group (P = 0.019). Conclusions: In our experience, RATT has a significantly better impact on body image than the conventional approach.
The effect of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) on body image is better than the conventional approach with cervicotomy: a preliminary report
Matteucci V.;Bai D.;Fregoli L.;Papini P.;Aghababyan A.;Miccoli P.;Materazzi G.
2020-01-01
Abstract
Background: Cosmetic satisfaction is not only based on the patient’s perception of the scar itself but is also related to body image self-evaluation. Cosmetic superiority of Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) over conventional thyroidectomy (CT) has not yet been clearly demonstrated. Aim of our study was to compare body image in patients undergoing CT versus RATT. Methods: The study included 160 (80 CT and 80 RATT) patients undergoing thyroidectomy between August 2014 and March 2018 at the Endocrine Surgery Department. The inclusion criteria were age 18 to < 60 years, female sex, thyroid volume < 30 mL, and nodule diameter < 5 cm. Scar length, operative time, and complications were analyzed. The body image questionnaire (BIQ) was used 3 months postoperatively. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Age was lower in RATT group (38.2 vs 41.4 years) (P < 0.0001). The nodule diameter was larger in RATT group (27.1 vs 23.1 mm) (P = 0.028). Operative time was longer in RATT group (93.7 vs 47.6 min) (P < 0.0001). The scar was longer in RATT group (59.9 vs 37.7 mm) (P < 0.0001). The groups had similar complication rates. BIQ showed that RATT patients answered more favorably to question 2, “Do you feel the operation has damaged your body?” (P = 0.042) and to question 3, “Do you feel less attractive as a result of your treatment?” (P = 0.024). Also self-global satisfaction was better in RATT group (P = 0.019). Conclusions: In our experience, RATT has a significantly better impact on body image than the conventional approach.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
