Purpose To meet clinicians’ request for adequate results and reliable reference ranges for testosterone, this study was planned with the aims (i) to verify the reliability of the reference interval for total testosterone (TT) declared by immunoassay manufacturer and adopted by laboratory, (ii) to compare results for serum TT obtained by immunoassay and LC–MS/MS and (iii) to verify if the cutoff values for low TT and measured free testosterone (FT), defined by Endocrine Society Guidelines for diagnosis of hypogonadism, are applicable to our study group. Methods Sera from anonymous young/middle-aged male blood donors were selected for the study. TT was measured by immunoassay and LC–MS/MS. SHBG was measured by immunoassay and used with albumin concentration to calculate FT according to Vermeulen’s formula. Results The reference interval declared by the manufacturer and adopted by the lab was validated. The two methods for TT evaluation correlated very well. TT and FT lower limits at 5th and 2.5th percentile are below the cutoffs reported in the literature for the diagnosis of hypogonadism. Conclusions The immunoassay currently used in our lab can be considered an adequate tool for TT, but it’s essential that clinical data agree with the biochemical ones, particularly in the presence of TT values between the lower limit of reference range and the cutoff values recommended by scientific societies.

Importance of total and measured free testosterone in diagnosis of male hypogonadism: immunoassay versus mass spectrometry in a population of healthy young/middle-aged blood donors

Saba, A.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Purpose To meet clinicians’ request for adequate results and reliable reference ranges for testosterone, this study was planned with the aims (i) to verify the reliability of the reference interval for total testosterone (TT) declared by immunoassay manufacturer and adopted by laboratory, (ii) to compare results for serum TT obtained by immunoassay and LC–MS/MS and (iii) to verify if the cutoff values for low TT and measured free testosterone (FT), defined by Endocrine Society Guidelines for diagnosis of hypogonadism, are applicable to our study group. Methods Sera from anonymous young/middle-aged male blood donors were selected for the study. TT was measured by immunoassay and LC–MS/MS. SHBG was measured by immunoassay and used with albumin concentration to calculate FT according to Vermeulen’s formula. Results The reference interval declared by the manufacturer and adopted by the lab was validated. The two methods for TT evaluation correlated very well. TT and FT lower limits at 5th and 2.5th percentile are below the cutoffs reported in the literature for the diagnosis of hypogonadism. Conclusions The immunoassay currently used in our lab can be considered an adequate tool for TT, but it’s essential that clinical data agree with the biochemical ones, particularly in the presence of TT values between the lower limit of reference range and the cutoff values recommended by scientific societies.
2021
Agretti, P.; Pelosini, C.; Bianchi, L.; Grosso, A. Del; Saba, A.; Canale, D.; Sessa, M. R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020_Manoscritto_Testosterone.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 397.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
397.86 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2020_Testosterone_JOE.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 998.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
998.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1044116
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact