Is the Da Vinci Xi system a real improvement for oncologic transoral robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature

In this paper, we reviewed the current literature about TORS procedures performed with Xi system and we discussed the pros and cons of this robotic system comparing it to the previous Si model. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for adequate published studies about TORS procedure performed with da Vinci Si and Xi models. Five papers on the TORS-Xi procedures met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These papers showed results based on 74 subjects (mean age 60.51 ± 4.55 years old). The most common TORS procedure was performed to address the oropharynx (65 procedures). One case (1.35%) of a tongue base tumor was converted into a transmandibular approach. One subject (1.35%) had a positive margin, while two subjects (2.7%) had close/uncertain margins at final histology. Nine papers on the TORS-Si procedures met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These papers showed results based on 128 subjects (mean age 59.79 ± 5.93 years old). The most common TORS procedure was performed to address the oropharynx (90 procedures). Three procedures (2.34%) were aborted due to inadequate exposure of the tumor. None of the subject had positive margins, while three subjects (2.34%) had close/uncertain margins at final histology. Despite its improved vision, easier docking and narrower robotic arms, the da Vinci Xi system has structural peculiarities that limit its applications for certain TORS procedures.