Aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare early and mid- term clinical and hemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with rapid-deployment bioprostheses (RDB) performed through conventional full-sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy.

Minimally Invasive Vs. Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses

Pacini, Davide;Colli, Andrea;Gregori, Dario;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare early and mid- term clinical and hemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with rapid-deployment bioprostheses (RDB) performed through conventional full-sternotomy versus mini-sternotomy.
2020
D'Onofrio, Augusto; Tessari, Chiara; Lorenzoni, Giulia; Cibin, Giorgia; Martinelli, Gian Luca; Alamanni, Francesco; Polvani, Gianluca; Solinas, Marco;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1055228
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact