In the essay, I address the issue of whether in Hegel's and Husserl's conception of philosophy there is a room for the modern conception of mathesis. I start from Lachterman's observation that mathesis is not an axiomatic or formalized system from which an infinity of statements can be derived, but it is rather a set of useful prescriptions for the motion of mind. From this perspective I claim that Hegel appropriates this conviction by refusing, however, to identify his logical set of prescriptions with mathesis, while Husserl leaves a room for it, thank to his criticism of the "technization" of science, even though he really never realizes it.
Syllogism and mathesis. Hegel and Husserl on the method of philosophy
MANCA D
2019-01-01
Abstract
In the essay, I address the issue of whether in Hegel's and Husserl's conception of philosophy there is a room for the modern conception of mathesis. I start from Lachterman's observation that mathesis is not an axiomatic or formalized system from which an infinity of statements can be derived, but it is rather a set of useful prescriptions for the motion of mind. From this perspective I claim that Hegel appropriates this conviction by refusing, however, to identify his logical set of prescriptions with mathesis, while Husserl leaves a room for it, thank to his criticism of the "technization" of science, even though he really never realizes it.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Manca_Syllogism_Mathesis.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
783.14 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
783.14 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


