Min delay violations are traditionally not modeled as possible faults as a result of manufacturing defects. Usually, path delay faults are implicitly assumed to be paths ' max delay violations. This, in turn, is based on the assumption that min delay violations are designed out. Most previous manufacturing defect/fault analysis works have not considered their effect on clock circuits. More recently, as burn-in becomes ineffective and process variations become more of an issue, latent defects, device degradation or wear out in the field would potentially also cripple the clock distribution network. Consequently, we should start considering also path (min) delay faults when designing on-line testable circuits, similar to what we currently do for path (max) delay faults. The challenges that this poses to the existing on-line testing strategies are discussed. Examples showing the possible incorrect behavior of a self-checking circuit as a result of this kind of faults are given. New on-line testing strategies should consequently be devised to deal with these faults. © 2006 IEEE.
Path (min) delay faults and their impact on self-checking circuits' operation
Rossi D.;
2006-01-01
Abstract
Min delay violations are traditionally not modeled as possible faults as a result of manufacturing defects. Usually, path delay faults are implicitly assumed to be paths ' max delay violations. This, in turn, is based on the assumption that min delay violations are designed out. Most previous manufacturing defect/fault analysis works have not considered their effect on clock circuits. More recently, as burn-in becomes ineffective and process variations become more of an issue, latent defects, device degradation or wear out in the field would potentially also cripple the clock distribution network. Consequently, we should start considering also path (min) delay faults when designing on-line testable circuits, similar to what we currently do for path (max) delay faults. The challenges that this poses to the existing on-line testing strategies are discussed. Examples showing the possible incorrect behavior of a self-checking circuit as a result of this kind of faults are given. New on-line testing strategies should consequently be devised to deal with these faults. © 2006 IEEE.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.