Drawing on a recent judgement of the Italian Supreme Court, this contribution deals with the matter of the unilateral change of the rate of return of the postal savings certificates operated by the Treasury. In particular, the paper aims to unveil the ratio and the limits of this power, which was provided by the repealed article 173 d.p.r. 156/1973 and was neither exactly comparable to an imperative supplementation of the contract nor to a common ius variandi.
L’articolo esamina la questione, recentemente affrontata dalle Sezioni Unite della Suprema Corte, relativa alle variazioni unilaterali del tasso di rendimento dei buoni postali fruttiferi decise dal Ministero del Tesoro nel vigore dell’abrogato art. 173 d.p.r. 156/1973. In particolare, vengono messe in luce la ratio e le condizioni di esercizio di tale potere di modifica, proponendosene una ricostruzione in chiave autonoma, non appieno riconducibile, cioè, né a un’ipotesi di integrazione cogente del contratto né a un’ipotesi di ius variandi comunemente inteso.
Integrazione cogente e ius variandi: un singolare intreccio nelle modifiche al rendimento dei buoni postali fruttiferi
Azzarri
2020-01-01
Abstract
Drawing on a recent judgement of the Italian Supreme Court, this contribution deals with the matter of the unilateral change of the rate of return of the postal savings certificates operated by the Treasury. In particular, the paper aims to unveil the ratio and the limits of this power, which was provided by the repealed article 173 d.p.r. 156/1973 and was neither exactly comparable to an imperative supplementation of the contract nor to a common ius variandi.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
