This paper challenges the conventional wisdom of the strategic trade policy – in which governments set subsidies for their own exporter firms – under unionisation by considering the realistic difference in the labour market institutions between producing countries, i.e. asymmetric bargaining agenda (Efficient Bargaining, EB, and Right-to Manage, RTM) in rival firms. We show that 1) the government whose firm is EB (resp. RTM) always finds convenient to set an export tax (resp. an export subsidy), regardless of whether the other government intervenes; 2) an asymmetric equilibrium emerges in which only one government intervenes; 3) under appropriate side-payments, governments would find beneficial to coordinate either over mutual intervention or free trade, with the latter ensuring higher welfare levels; 4) the asymmetric equilibrium is preferred by the RTM country because its national social welfare under intervention is always higher than under free trade. These results show that active trade policies in the RTM country partially solve the classical Prisoner’s Dilemma of the trade policy game.

Strategic trade policy with asymmetric bargaining agenda

Fanti Luciano;
2020-01-01

Abstract

This paper challenges the conventional wisdom of the strategic trade policy – in which governments set subsidies for their own exporter firms – under unionisation by considering the realistic difference in the labour market institutions between producing countries, i.e. asymmetric bargaining agenda (Efficient Bargaining, EB, and Right-to Manage, RTM) in rival firms. We show that 1) the government whose firm is EB (resp. RTM) always finds convenient to set an export tax (resp. an export subsidy), regardless of whether the other government intervenes; 2) an asymmetric equilibrium emerges in which only one government intervenes; 3) under appropriate side-payments, governments would find beneficial to coordinate either over mutual intervention or free trade, with the latter ensuring higher welfare levels; 4) the asymmetric equilibrium is preferred by the RTM country because its national social welfare under intervention is always higher than under free trade. These results show that active trade policies in the RTM country partially solve the classical Prisoner’s Dilemma of the trade policy game.
2020
Fanti, Luciano; Buccella, Domenico
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
320_fantibuccellaricfinal.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 266.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
266.33 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1080146
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact