In three surveys of adults in 5 nations, we investigated how shared beliefs about the political system motivate individuals’ political engagement. Specifically, we tested whether individuals’ beliefs that the political context is fair, non-corrupt, and their belief that they could influence politics motivates political engagement to a higher extent for higher compared to lower status group members. In a novel use of social dominance theory, we theoretically conceived of these political beliefs as legitimizing ideologies, so that we predicted that people with higher social dominance orientation endorse these beliefs, which in turn enhance the motivation to engage in politics to support current social hierarchical systems. Moreover, we expected that these relationships would be stronger for higher compared to lower status groups. These hypotheses were tested considering different levels of group status: wealth status within a country (Study 1), political-regional differences within a country (Study 2), and international status (i.e., between countries; Study 3), and were largely supported.

From Social Dominance Orientation to Political Engagement: The Role of Group Status and Shared Beliefs in Politics Across Multiple Contexts

Aiello A.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2022-01-01

Abstract

In three surveys of adults in 5 nations, we investigated how shared beliefs about the political system motivate individuals’ political engagement. Specifically, we tested whether individuals’ beliefs that the political context is fair, non-corrupt, and their belief that they could influence politics motivates political engagement to a higher extent for higher compared to lower status group members. In a novel use of social dominance theory, we theoretically conceived of these political beliefs as legitimizing ideologies, so that we predicted that people with higher social dominance orientation endorse these beliefs, which in turn enhance the motivation to engage in politics to support current social hierarchical systems. Moreover, we expected that these relationships would be stronger for higher compared to lower status groups. These hypotheses were tested considering different levels of group status: wealth status within a country (Study 1), political-regional differences within a country (Study 2), and international status (i.e., between countries; Study 3), and were largely supported.
2022
Prati, F.; Pratto, F.; Bou Zeineddine, F.; Sweetman, J.; Aiello, A.; Petrovic, N.; Rubini, M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Political Psychology - 2021 - Prati - From Social Dominance Orientation to Political Engagement The Role of Group Status.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 250.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
250.15 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Prati+MainManuscript12_01.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 431.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
431.76 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1086611
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact