Spectral clustering is a powerful method for finding structure in a dataset through the eigenvectors of a similarity matrix. It often outperforms traditional clustering algorithms such as k-means when the structure of the individual clusters is highly non-convex. Its accuracy depends on how the similarity between pairs of data points is defined. Two important items contribute to the construction of the similarity matrix: the sparsity of the underlying weighted graph, which depends mainly on the distances among data points, and the similarity function. When a Gaussian similarity function is used, the choice of the scale parameter σ can be critical. In this paper we examine both items, the sparsity and the selection of suitable σ’s, based either directly on the graph associated to the dataset or on the minimal spanning tree (MST) of the graph. An extensive numerical experimentation on artificial and real-world datasets has been carried out to compare the performances of the methods.

Construction of the similarity matrix for the spectral clustering method: Numerical experiments

Menchi O.
Penultimo
;
Romani F.
Ultimo
2020-01-01

Abstract

Spectral clustering is a powerful method for finding structure in a dataset through the eigenvectors of a similarity matrix. It often outperforms traditional clustering algorithms such as k-means when the structure of the individual clusters is highly non-convex. Its accuracy depends on how the similarity between pairs of data points is defined. Two important items contribute to the construction of the similarity matrix: the sparsity of the underlying weighted graph, which depends mainly on the distances among data points, and the similarity function. When a Gaussian similarity function is used, the choice of the scale parameter σ can be critical. In this paper we examine both items, the sparsity and the selection of suitable σ’s, based either directly on the graph associated to the dataset or on the minimal spanning tree (MST) of the graph. An extensive numerical experimentation on artificial and real-world datasets has been carried out to compare the performances of the methods.
2020
Favati, P.; Lotti, G.; Menchi, O.; Romani, F.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1089743
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact