Fruit extracts of Sambucus nigra L. (elderberry) and Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) have several applications in nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries thanks to their richness in antioxidant polyphenols, whose composition changes with the extraction method applied. We aimed to compare the efficiency of the fermentation extraction, recently applied by industries, with the ultrasound‐assisted extraction–UAE, a well‐known and efficient technique, on the yield of antioxidant polyphenols from elderberry fruits and pomegranate fruit‐peels. Extracts were obtained by both methods, analyzed by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the antioxi-dant capacities were evaluated using 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging (HRS) assays. The main compounds detected in elderberry were caffeoyl and quercetin derivatives, present in higher amounts in UAE extracts. In pomegranate, punicalagin were the main constituents, also detected in higher contents in the UAE extracts compared to fermented ones. The UAE was more suitable for extracting anthocyanins from pomegranate. In addition, higher antiox-idant capacities were observed in UAE extracts, possibly due to their richness in polyphenols. Therefore, despite the recent wide applicability and the good performance of the fermentation pro-cess, the UAE may be considered more efficient for the extraction of polyphenols from S. nigra and P. granatum fruits and may be used to obtain polyphenolic antioxidant extracts to be applied by several industries.

Comparison between fermentation and ultrasound‐assisted extraction: Which is the most efficient method to obtain antioxidant polyphenols from sambucus nigra and punicagranatum fruits?

Degano I.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Mandoli A.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Fruit extracts of Sambucus nigra L. (elderberry) and Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) have several applications in nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries thanks to their richness in antioxidant polyphenols, whose composition changes with the extraction method applied. We aimed to compare the efficiency of the fermentation extraction, recently applied by industries, with the ultrasound‐assisted extraction–UAE, a well‐known and efficient technique, on the yield of antioxidant polyphenols from elderberry fruits and pomegranate fruit‐peels. Extracts were obtained by both methods, analyzed by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the antioxi-dant capacities were evaluated using 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging (HRS) assays. The main compounds detected in elderberry were caffeoyl and quercetin derivatives, present in higher amounts in UAE extracts. In pomegranate, punicalagin were the main constituents, also detected in higher contents in the UAE extracts compared to fermented ones. The UAE was more suitable for extracting anthocyanins from pomegranate. In addition, higher antiox-idant capacities were observed in UAE extracts, possibly due to their richness in polyphenols. Therefore, despite the recent wide applicability and the good performance of the fermentation pro-cess, the UAE may be considered more efficient for the extraction of polyphenols from S. nigra and P. granatum fruits and may be used to obtain polyphenolic antioxidant extracts to be applied by several industries.
2021
Nascimento, L. B. S.; Gori, A.; Degano, I.; Mandoli, A.; Ferrini, F.; Brunetti, C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021_horticulturae-07-00386-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 298.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
298.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1110252
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact