After an examination of the concept of relation in Kant (Critique of pure Reason) and of relatives in Aristotle (Metaphysics, Categories), I compare and contrast Hegel’s Logic of essence, especially the cognate notion of actuality, with Kant and Aristotle. Aristotle’s relatives are not discussed by Hegel in the Logic of essence because the systematic place of Aristotle’s philosophy, with its speculative key concept of energeia, is the heart of the Logic of the Concept. I conclude by showing that for Hegel relation to other is not the final word because it cannot account for self-relation, let alone exhaust the explanation of it.

Relation et effectivité chez Hegel, Kant et Aristote

FERRARIN ALFREDO
2021-01-01

Abstract

After an examination of the concept of relation in Kant (Critique of pure Reason) and of relatives in Aristotle (Metaphysics, Categories), I compare and contrast Hegel’s Logic of essence, especially the cognate notion of actuality, with Kant and Aristotle. Aristotle’s relatives are not discussed by Hegel in the Logic of essence because the systematic place of Aristotle’s philosophy, with its speculative key concept of energeia, is the heart of the Logic of the Concept. I conclude by showing that for Hegel relation to other is not the final word because it cannot account for self-relation, let alone exhaust the explanation of it.
2021
Ferrarin, Alfredo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021 RPL Ferrarin.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 338.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
338.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1121308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact