Background/Aim: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is under investigation in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Patients and Methods: A total of 49 patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer who underwent two different regimens of weekly dose-dense NACT were included. The objective was to evaluate clinical/pathological response and toxicity profile. Results: A clinical complete response and partial response were obtained in 43 patients with a clinical overall response rate of 88%. Among the 42 surgically treated patients, 7 (17%) and 35 (83%) achieved a pathological overall optimal response and a suboptimal pathological response, respectively. G3-G4 neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients, whereas no cases of G3 thrombocytopenia, G3 anemia and febrile neutropenia were observed. Conclusion: Dose-dense NACT is safe, has acceptable toxicity, and obtains good clinical response, but is less effective in terms of pathological overall optimal response rates compared to other regimens.

Dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in cervical cancer: Efficacy on pathological response

GADDUCCI A.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background/Aim: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is under investigation in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Patients and Methods: A total of 49 patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer who underwent two different regimens of weekly dose-dense NACT were included. The objective was to evaluate clinical/pathological response and toxicity profile. Results: A clinical complete response and partial response were obtained in 43 patients with a clinical overall response rate of 88%. Among the 42 surgically treated patients, 7 (17%) and 35 (83%) achieved a pathological overall optimal response and a suboptimal pathological response, respectively. G3-G4 neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients, whereas no cases of G3 thrombocytopenia, G3 anemia and febrile neutropenia were observed. Conclusion: Dose-dense NACT is safe, has acceptable toxicity, and obtains good clinical response, but is less effective in terms of pathological overall optimal response rates compared to other regimens.
2021
DI MARTINO, G.; Lissoni, A. A.; Ferrari, D.; DI MEO, M. L.; Cosio, S.; Gadducci, A.; Landoni, F.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1121671
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact