This paper focuses on the relevance of the role of legal sources in regulating AI. It aims at investigating how different legal systems, in particular USA and China, that are often considered as the two models of AI development and regulation alternative to the European one, take AI into consideration from the legal point of view. It analyses the most recent regulatory interventions in the field of AI, trying to make a state of the art and outline future perspectives.
L'articolo fa parte di un numero monografico della rivista, coordinato da Carlo Casonato, sul tema dell'Intelligenza Artificiale nel diritto europeo e comparato.
Le fonti nel diritto comparato: analisi di scenari extraeuropei (Stati Uniti e Cina)
STRADELLA E
2022-01-01
Abstract
This paper focuses on the relevance of the role of legal sources in regulating AI. It aims at investigating how different legal systems, in particular USA and China, that are often considered as the two models of AI development and regulation alternative to the European one, take AI into consideration from the legal point of view. It analyses the most recent regulatory interventions in the field of AI, trying to make a state of the art and outline future perspectives.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stradella_DPCE2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
359.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
359.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
