(1) Background: Visually induced vertigo (i.e., vertigo provoked by moving visual scenes) can be considered a noticeable feature of vestibular migraines (VM) and can be present in patients suffering from acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUV). Hypersensitivity to moving or conflicting visual stimulation is named visual dependence. (2) Methods: Visuo-vestibular interactions were analyzed via the functional Head Impulse Test (fHIT) with and without optokinetic stimulation (o-fHIT) in 25 patients with VM, in 20 subjects affected by AUV, and in 20 healthy subjects. We calculated the percentage of correct answers (Ê) without and with the addition of the optokinetic background (OB). (3) In VM groups, the Ê on the fHIT was 92.07% without OB and 73.66% with OB. A significant difference was found between Ê on the deficit side and that on the normal side in AUV, both without OB and with OB. (4) Conclusions: The fHIT results in terms of Ê with and without OB could be useful to identify the presence of a dynamic visual dependence, especially in patients suffering from VM. The difference in Ê with and without OB could provide instrumental support to help correctly identify subjects suffering from VM. We propose the use of the fHIT in clinical practice whenever there is a need to highlight a condition of dynamic visual dependence.
The role of the functional head impulse test with and without optokinetic stimuli in vestibular migraine and acute unilateral vestibulopathy: Discovering a dynamic visual dependence
Casani A. P.;Lazzerini F.;Marconi O.;
2021-01-01
Abstract
(1) Background: Visually induced vertigo (i.e., vertigo provoked by moving visual scenes) can be considered a noticeable feature of vestibular migraines (VM) and can be present in patients suffering from acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUV). Hypersensitivity to moving or conflicting visual stimulation is named visual dependence. (2) Methods: Visuo-vestibular interactions were analyzed via the functional Head Impulse Test (fHIT) with and without optokinetic stimulation (o-fHIT) in 25 patients with VM, in 20 subjects affected by AUV, and in 20 healthy subjects. We calculated the percentage of correct answers (Ê) without and with the addition of the optokinetic background (OB). (3) In VM groups, the Ê on the fHIT was 92.07% without OB and 73.66% with OB. A significant difference was found between Ê on the deficit side and that on the normal side in AUV, both without OB and with OB. (4) Conclusions: The fHIT results in terms of Ê with and without OB could be useful to identify the presence of a dynamic visual dependence, especially in patients suffering from VM. The difference in Ê with and without OB could provide instrumental support to help correctly identify subjects suffering from VM. We propose the use of the fHIT in clinical practice whenever there is a need to highlight a condition of dynamic visual dependence.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
jcm-10-03787.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.39 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.39 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.