The author analyzes the ordinance n. 188 of 2021 with which the Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the conflict of attribution raised by the Deputy against the decision of the President of the Chamber to declare his bill inadmissible because he considered it unconstitutional. The author questions the legitimacy and extent of such a power
Presidente di assemblea “giudice” (della costituzionalità) o “arbitro” (della vita parlamentare)?
Gianluca Famiglietti
2022-01-01
Abstract
The author analyzes the ordinance n. 188 of 2021 with which the Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the conflict of attribution raised by the Deputy against the decision of the President of the Chamber to declare his bill inadmissible because he considered it unconstitutional. The author questions the legitimacy and extent of such a powerFile in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
