It is well known that the young Cicero’s manual in two books (Rhetorici libri duo), commonly known in the modern age as De inventione, was the most read Latin rhetorical work in the late ancient age. The explanatory commentary on it, written by Gaius Marius Victorinus in the fourth century. A.D., which had good success during medieval and humanistic times, is commonly considered a not-so-creative treatise; it offers, however, interesting information to understand the correct meaning and real scope of the oratory praevaricatio, a forensic offense that can be sanctioned extra ordinem starting from the third century. A.D.
"Non, quemadmodum causa postulat, narratur ...". Mario Vittorino e la spiegazione di Cic. inv. 1.30: tra tecnica espositiva e "praevaricatio" oratoria
procchi
2022-01-01
Abstract
It is well known that the young Cicero’s manual in two books (Rhetorici libri duo), commonly known in the modern age as De inventione, was the most read Latin rhetorical work in the late ancient age. The explanatory commentary on it, written by Gaius Marius Victorinus in the fourth century. A.D., which had good success during medieval and humanistic times, is commonly considered a not-so-creative treatise; it offers, however, interesting information to understand the correct meaning and real scope of the oratory praevaricatio, a forensic offense that can be sanctioned extra ordinem starting from the third century. A.D.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Procchi_Non quemadmodum causa postulat narratur_JUS on line 4_2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
609.48 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
609.48 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.