Cross-societal differences in cooperation and trust among strangers in the provision of public goods may be key to understanding how societies are managing the COVID-19 pandemic. We report a survey conducted across 41 societies between March and May 2020 (N = 34,526), and test pre-registered hypotheses about how cross-societal differences in cooperation and trust relate to prosocial COVID-19 responses (e.g., social distancing), stringency of policies, and support for behavioral regulations (e.g., mandatory quarantine). We further tested whether cross-societal variation in institutions and ecologies theorized to impact cooperation were associated with prosocial COVID-19 responses, including institutional quality, religiosity, and historical prevalence of pathogens. We found substantial variation across societies in prosocial COVID-19 responses, stringency of policies, and support for behavioral regulations. However, we found no consistent evidence to support the idea that cross-societal variation in cooperation and trust among strangers is associated with these outcomes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These results were replicated with another independent cross-cultural COVID-19 dataset (N = 112,136), and in both snowball and representative samples. We discuss implications of our results, including challenging the assumption that managing the COVID-19 pandemic across societies is best modeled as a public goods dilemma.

Cooperation and Trust Across Societies During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Di Santo D.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Cross-societal differences in cooperation and trust among strangers in the provision of public goods may be key to understanding how societies are managing the COVID-19 pandemic. We report a survey conducted across 41 societies between March and May 2020 (N = 34,526), and test pre-registered hypotheses about how cross-societal differences in cooperation and trust relate to prosocial COVID-19 responses (e.g., social distancing), stringency of policies, and support for behavioral regulations (e.g., mandatory quarantine). We further tested whether cross-societal variation in institutions and ecologies theorized to impact cooperation were associated with prosocial COVID-19 responses, including institutional quality, religiosity, and historical prevalence of pathogens. We found substantial variation across societies in prosocial COVID-19 responses, stringency of policies, and support for behavioral regulations. However, we found no consistent evidence to support the idea that cross-societal variation in cooperation and trust among strangers is associated with these outcomes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These results were replicated with another independent cross-cultural COVID-19 dataset (N = 112,136), and in both snowball and representative samples. We discuss implications of our results, including challenging the assumption that managing the COVID-19 pandemic across societies is best modeled as a public goods dilemma.
2021
Romano, A.; Spadaro, G.; Balliet, D.; Joireman, J.; Van Lissa, C.; Jin, S.; Agostini, M.; Belanger, J. J.; Gutzkow, B.; Kreienkamp, J.; Abakoumkin, G.; Abdul Khaiyom, J. H.; Ahmedi, V.; Akkas, H.; Almenara, C. A.; Atta, M.; Bagci, S. C.; Basel, S.; Berisha Kida, E.; Buttrick, N. R.; Chobthamkit, P.; Choi, H. -S.; Cristea, M.; Csaba, S.; Damnjanovic, K.; Danyliuk, I.; Dash, A.; Di Santo, D.; Douglas, K. M.; Enea, V.; Faller, D. G.; Fitzsimons, G.; Gheorghiu, A.; Gómez, A.; Han, Q.; Helmy, M.; Hudiyana, J.; Jeronimus, B. F.; Jiang, D. -Y.; Jovanović, V.; Kamenov, Z.; Kende, A.; Keng, S. -L.; Kieu, T. T. T.; Koc, Y.; Kovyazina, K.; Kozytska, I.; Krause, J.; Kruglanski, A. W.; Kurapov, A.; Kutlaca, M.; Lantos, N. A.; Lemay, E. P.; Lesmana, C. B. G.; Louis, W. R.; Lueders, A.; Malik, N. I.; Martinez, A.; Mccabe, K. O.; Milla, M. N.; Mehulić, J.; Mohammed, I.; Molinario, E.; Moyano, M.; Muhammad, H.; Mula, S.; Muluk, H.; Myroniuk, S.; Najafi, R.; Nisa, C. F.; Nyúl, B.; O'Keefe, P. A.; Osuna, J. J. O.; Osin, E. N.; Park, J.; Pica, G.; Pierro, A.; Rees, J.; Reitsema, A. M.; Resta, E.; Rullo, M.; Ryan, M. K.; Samekin, A.; Santtila, P.; Sasin, E.; Schumpe, B. M.; Selim, H. A.; Stanton, M. V.; Stroebe, W.; Sultana, S.; Sutton, R. M.; Tseliou, E.; Utsugi, A.; van Breen, J. A.; Van Veen, K.; Vandellen, M. R.; Vázquez, A.; Wollast, R.; Yeung, V. W. -L.; Zand, S.; Žeželj, I. L.; Zheng, B.; Zick, A.; Zúñiga, C.; Leander, N. P.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1158156
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact