The paper analyzes the complexity of social-ecological transition policies and processes on the ground focusing on trade-offs and emerging conflicts engendered by combined environmental-social-technological programs and innovations. To date, there has been a limited focus in the literature on empirical cases analyzing ecological transition, distributive effects, social risks and policies to counter them. To help fill this gap, the paper discusses three qualitative case studies as part of a research project on social cohesion in ecological transitions in Tuscany, Italy. In particular, it examines the ongoing transition strategies and practices, bringing out several aspects that highlight the sources of controversies among actors and the contextual variability and complexity of their “playgrounds”, namely: (1) the role of time, space and relational patterns, and ensuing problems of governance, coordination and synchronization; (2) the way in which institutional and technological transformations are embedded in trans-contextual relations and conflicts; (3) the role of different sources and kinds of knowledge in supporting or hampering the ecological transitions; and (4) the shifting balances between top-down strategies and regulation, and bottom-up processes of civic associations and social movements. The paper then contributes by analyzing the attempts at providing social security by means of more or less explicitly designed eco-social policies and practices and highlighting some relevant lessons learned and methodological recommendations for future sustainable welfare design.
The conflicts of ecological transition on the ground and the role of eco-social policies: Lessons from Italian case studies
Marta Bonetti;Matteo Villa
2023-01-01
Abstract
The paper analyzes the complexity of social-ecological transition policies and processes on the ground focusing on trade-offs and emerging conflicts engendered by combined environmental-social-technological programs and innovations. To date, there has been a limited focus in the literature on empirical cases analyzing ecological transition, distributive effects, social risks and policies to counter them. To help fill this gap, the paper discusses three qualitative case studies as part of a research project on social cohesion in ecological transitions in Tuscany, Italy. In particular, it examines the ongoing transition strategies and practices, bringing out several aspects that highlight the sources of controversies among actors and the contextual variability and complexity of their “playgrounds”, namely: (1) the role of time, space and relational patterns, and ensuing problems of governance, coordination and synchronization; (2) the way in which institutional and technological transformations are embedded in trans-contextual relations and conflicts; (3) the role of different sources and kinds of knowledge in supporting or hampering the ecological transitions; and (4) the shifting balances between top-down strategies and regulation, and bottom-up processes of civic associations and social movements. The paper then contributes by analyzing the attempts at providing social security by means of more or less explicitly designed eco-social policies and practices and highlighting some relevant lessons learned and methodological recommendations for future sustainable welfare design.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Conflicts-of-ecological-transition.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
585.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
585.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Conflicts-of-ecological-transition-1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
352.95 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
352.95 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.