The article discusses the implications of the cases Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Petitioner v. University Of North Carolina, Et Al., in which race-conscious college admission programs were struck down by the Supreme Court, considering U.S. Constitution to be colorblind. More specifically, the text outlines the jurisprudence developed by the Supreme Court on affirmative action, focusing on the constitutionality of college admissions programs and strict scrutiny as defined in the Bakke case and subsequent cases.
L’incostituzionalità dei programmi di ammissione di Harvard e della University of North Carolina a causa della “razza”: una ricostruzione giurisprudenziale delle affirmative actions nell’ordinamento statunitense
Alessia Riccioli
2023-01-01
Abstract
The article discusses the implications of the cases Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Petitioner v. University Of North Carolina, Et Al., in which race-conscious college admission programs were struck down by the Supreme Court, considering U.S. Constitution to be colorblind. More specifically, the text outlines the jurisprudence developed by the Supreme Court on affirmative action, focusing on the constitutionality of college admissions programs and strict scrutiny as defined in the Bakke case and subsequent cases.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
03-Riccioli-FQC-3-2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
635.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
635.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.