Abstract: The origins and development of the Pamphylian alphabet and its rela-tions with the other Greek alphabetic traditions have so far remained obscure. This study aims at elucidating the feature that, more than any other, has resisted a safe interpretation: the coexistence, without parallels in the Greek world, of at least two graphemes, namely and , representing the posterior approxi-mant. To unravel the intricacy, we adopt a novel perspective, namely the ‘corpus doctrinae theory’, in order to address potential biases arisen from structuralist approaches. Preliminarily, we argue, on the basis of the distribution of the two graphemes, that such a cohabitation cannot always be explained by phonetic reasons. Therefore, we discuss the selection of and in the broader frame of the formation and transmission of the Greek alphabets, showing that Pamphy-lian did not stem from a single matrix-script, but rather goes back to the NE Pelo-ponnesian corpus doctrinae. Such a filiation explains the origins of , as both its paleography and phonetic value show that it is an adaptation of the Corinthi-an-type .
Shaping the Pamphylian alphabet: the puzzle of the two digammas
Selvi, Eleonora
Primo
;
2023-01-01
Abstract
Abstract: The origins and development of the Pamphylian alphabet and its rela-tions with the other Greek alphabetic traditions have so far remained obscure. This study aims at elucidating the feature that, more than any other, has resisted a safe interpretation: the coexistence, without parallels in the Greek world, of at least two graphemes, namely and , representing the posterior approxi-mant. To unravel the intricacy, we adopt a novel perspective, namely the ‘corpus doctrinae theory’, in order to address potential biases arisen from structuralist approaches. Preliminarily, we argue, on the basis of the distribution of the two graphemes, that such a cohabitation cannot always be explained by phonetic reasons. Therefore, we discuss the selection of and in the broader frame of the formation and transmission of the Greek alphabets, showing that Pamphy-lian did not stem from a single matrix-script, but rather goes back to the NE Pelo-ponnesian corpus doctrinae. Such a filiation explains the origins of , as both its paleography and phonetic value show that it is an adaptation of the Corinthi-an-type .I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
