This paper argues for the resumption of a conjecture by Garatoni in Cic. Mil. 2 (nec illa praesidia instead of non illa praesidia), as well as for the omission of terroris; and for the revaluation of Birt’s hypothesis of a loss of some lines in our tradition.
Una lacuna nell’esordio della ‘pro Milone’? Nota al testo di Cic. ‘Mil.’ 2
Lucia Galli
2021-01-01
Abstract
This paper argues for the resumption of a conjecture by Garatoni in Cic. Mil. 2 (nec illa praesidia instead of non illa praesidia), as well as for the omission of terroris; and for the revaluation of Birt’s hypothesis of a loss of some lines in our tradition.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
