In the Italian legal system the “suffering” of the mandatory principle enshrined in Section 112 of the Constitution has led to an heated debate on the role of public prosecution and the organizational structure of its office. DPCE’s special edition adopts a comparative approach to the issue which aims to provide an overview of 17 legal systems through a common path of analysis in order to help the debate on the topic. Despite the specific features of each jurisdiction analysed, a common trend emerges: in front of an increasing blurring of the bipartition between compulsory and discretionary systems, an “enlightened” hybridization establishes itself through the provision of guidelines and systems of control.
The public prosecutor in the major contemporary legal systems: checks and balances of criminal prosecution. An introduction
saulle panizza;
2024-01-01
Abstract
In the Italian legal system the “suffering” of the mandatory principle enshrined in Section 112 of the Constitution has led to an heated debate on the role of public prosecution and the organizational structure of its office. DPCE’s special edition adopts a comparative approach to the issue which aims to provide an overview of 17 legal systems through a common path of analysis in order to help the debate on the topic. Despite the specific features of each jurisdiction analysed, a common trend emerges: in front of an increasing blurring of the bipartition between compulsory and discretionary systems, an “enlightened” hybridization establishes itself through the provision of guidelines and systems of control.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Panizza - Lonati DPCE on line 2024-1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
386.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
386.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.