The essay focuses on the significance of the pacifist principle in the transition from the abstract to the concrete dimension in a conflictive international context. Two distinct components would be detectable in the pacifist principle, one ‘axiological’ whereby it, as a supreme principle, should concern all the policies of a state concerning the use of force, and the other ‘dialogical’, which would have the aim of preventing the value of peace from being overwhelmed by global events. The pacifist principle, in a concrete dimension, does not deny the right to legitimate defence (even collective) against armed aggression, and to a limited and ‘functional’ use of force. However, it would be desirable for other states to explore every useful tool for a diplomatic resolution of the conflict.The contribution, starting from a ‘general’ reconstruction of the pacifist principle and highlighting the differences in the approaches of constitutional law and international law, turns to the Italian experience and the most recent events to verify whether the principle of Article 11 of the Constitution is respected or has been bypassed by the imperatives of international politics.

Il principio pacifista tra identificazione del fondamento astratto e applicazione concreta

Antonello Lo Calzo
2024-01-01

Abstract

The essay focuses on the significance of the pacifist principle in the transition from the abstract to the concrete dimension in a conflictive international context. Two distinct components would be detectable in the pacifist principle, one ‘axiological’ whereby it, as a supreme principle, should concern all the policies of a state concerning the use of force, and the other ‘dialogical’, which would have the aim of preventing the value of peace from being overwhelmed by global events. The pacifist principle, in a concrete dimension, does not deny the right to legitimate defence (even collective) against armed aggression, and to a limited and ‘functional’ use of force. However, it would be desirable for other states to explore every useful tool for a diplomatic resolution of the conflict.The contribution, starting from a ‘general’ reconstruction of the pacifist principle and highlighting the differences in the approaches of constitutional law and international law, turns to the Italian experience and the most recent events to verify whether the principle of Article 11 of the Constitution is respected or has been bypassed by the imperatives of international politics.
2024
LO CALZO, Antonello
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1245387
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact