The increasing interests in Moon exploration have led in recent years to international collaborations between space agencies aimed to assemble and operate the Gateway, an orbiting spaceport located on a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) about the second libration point of the Earth–Moon system (EML-2). In this context, transfer strategies between the Earth and the spaceport cover a key role for both assembly and resupply missions. The presented work is thus focused on one leg of the transfer: the phasing maneuver. This work is conducted under the hypotheses of the Circular Restricted Three-Body problem (CR3BP) in which the Earth and the Moon are the only bodies that influence the spacecraft motion. The primaries are assumed to have a circular motion around their common barycenter. Under these hypotheses, is demonstrated the existence of periodic orbits, such as the Halo orbit family, that are exploited to design a proposed phasing maneuver. Two strategies are investigated: Halo parking orbit to NRHO two-impulses transfer and direct phasing with manifold exploitation. The first strategy is an optimal two-impulses transfer departing an EML-2 southern Halo and targeting the baseline NRHO. The second strategy considers the chaser already injected on the Gateway's NRHO. Poincare maps are employed to identify unstable/stable manifolds intersections in search of low-energy phasing trajectories that leave the reference orbit along the unstable branch before re-entering it via the stable one. Three-impulses transfers with similar costs are found patching together these arcs. The two strategies are thus compared to highlight their advantages and disadvantages with the perspective of a real autonomous cargo mission around the Moon to refurnish the orbiting station.

Two and three impulses phasing strategy with a spacecraft orbiting on an Earth–Moon NRHO

Bucchioni G.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

The increasing interests in Moon exploration have led in recent years to international collaborations between space agencies aimed to assemble and operate the Gateway, an orbiting spaceport located on a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) about the second libration point of the Earth–Moon system (EML-2). In this context, transfer strategies between the Earth and the spaceport cover a key role for both assembly and resupply missions. The presented work is thus focused on one leg of the transfer: the phasing maneuver. This work is conducted under the hypotheses of the Circular Restricted Three-Body problem (CR3BP) in which the Earth and the Moon are the only bodies that influence the spacecraft motion. The primaries are assumed to have a circular motion around their common barycenter. Under these hypotheses, is demonstrated the existence of periodic orbits, such as the Halo orbit family, that are exploited to design a proposed phasing maneuver. Two strategies are investigated: Halo parking orbit to NRHO two-impulses transfer and direct phasing with manifold exploitation. The first strategy is an optimal two-impulses transfer departing an EML-2 southern Halo and targeting the baseline NRHO. The second strategy considers the chaser already injected on the Gateway's NRHO. Poincare maps are employed to identify unstable/stable manifolds intersections in search of low-energy phasing trajectories that leave the reference orbit along the unstable branch before re-entering it via the stable one. Three-impulses transfers with similar costs are found patching together these arcs. The two strategies are thus compared to highlight their advantages and disadvantages with the perspective of a real autonomous cargo mission around the Moon to refurnish the orbiting station.
2022
Fossa, A.; Bucchioni, G.; Blazquez, E.; Canalias, E.; Lizy-Destrez, S.; Bertrand, R.; Lamy, A.; Goester, J. -F.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1248827
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact