Birds are known to be carriers of ticks, both Argasidae and Ixodidae, which often harbor bacterial pathogens. Climatic changes observed in the last years have influenced tick distributions in several geographic areas and the migratory behaviors of many avian species; consequently, wild birds can be responsible for the introduction of ticks and relative pathogens, most of which are zoonotic, in new environments. Some studies have been carried out to detect tick-borne bacteria in ticks removed from birds worldwide, but surveys on the presence of these pathogens directly in avifauna are very scanty. This study evaluated the occurrence of tick-borne bacteria, such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia spp., in avian spleen samples, and the obtained results suggested that wild avifauna may be involved in the epidemiology of some of the investigated pathogens. Birds are known to be carriers of ticks infected by tick-borne pathogens, including bacteria. However, not many studies have been carried out on avian tissues to detect these agents. The aim of the present survey was to investigate, using PCR, the presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia spp. in the spleens collected from 300 wild birds of different orders and species from Central Italy. A total of 53 (17.67%) samples were PCR positive for at least one investigated pathogen. One (0.33%) bird was positive for Bartonella spp., five (1.67%) birds were positive for C. burnetii, eleven (3.67%) for B. burgdorferi s.l., and thirty-six (12%) for C. psittaci. No coinfection was detected. All samples were negative for A. phagocytophilum, E. canis, F. tularensis, and Rickettsia spp. The findings showed that wild birds may harbor different zoonotic tick-borne bacteria; therefore, they can contribute to the diffusion of these agents.
Molecular Survey on the Occurrence of Tick-Borne Bacteria in Wild Birds from Central Italy
FABRIZIO BERTELLONIPrimo
;GIULIA CAGNOLISecondo
;Valentina Virginia Ebani
Ultimo
2024-01-01
Abstract
Birds are known to be carriers of ticks, both Argasidae and Ixodidae, which often harbor bacterial pathogens. Climatic changes observed in the last years have influenced tick distributions in several geographic areas and the migratory behaviors of many avian species; consequently, wild birds can be responsible for the introduction of ticks and relative pathogens, most of which are zoonotic, in new environments. Some studies have been carried out to detect tick-borne bacteria in ticks removed from birds worldwide, but surveys on the presence of these pathogens directly in avifauna are very scanty. This study evaluated the occurrence of tick-borne bacteria, such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia spp., in avian spleen samples, and the obtained results suggested that wild avifauna may be involved in the epidemiology of some of the investigated pathogens. Birds are known to be carriers of ticks infected by tick-borne pathogens, including bacteria. However, not many studies have been carried out on avian tissues to detect these agents. The aim of the present survey was to investigate, using PCR, the presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, Francisella tularensis, and Rickettsia spp. in the spleens collected from 300 wild birds of different orders and species from Central Italy. A total of 53 (17.67%) samples were PCR positive for at least one investigated pathogen. One (0.33%) bird was positive for Bartonella spp., five (1.67%) birds were positive for C. burnetii, eleven (3.67%) for B. burgdorferi s.l., and thirty-six (12%) for C. psittaci. No coinfection was detected. All samples were negative for A. phagocytophilum, E. canis, F. tularensis, and Rickettsia spp. The findings showed that wild birds may harbor different zoonotic tick-borne bacteria; therefore, they can contribute to the diffusion of these agents.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
vetsci-11-00284-v2_Molecular Survey on the Occurrence of Tick-Borne Bacteria in Wild Birds from Central Italy.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
251.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
251.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.